Breitling Navitimer B01 Chronograph 41
AB0139211B1A1
- Case
- 41mm
- MSRP
- $10,700
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 70h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
AB0139211B1A1
310.30.42.50.01.002
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Collectors who want strong aviation heritage and a more interactive, specialized chronograph experience
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want the best daily-wear balance of comfort, legibility, and modern movement protection
The Breitling uses an automatic in-house Breitling 01 manufacture caliber with 47 jewels, 28,800 vph, and a 70-hour power reserve, so it brings the advantages of self-winding convenience, longer reserve, and a technically respected column-wheel chronograph architecture as described in the wearability notes. The Omega uses the manual-wind Caliber 3861 with 26 jewels, 21,600 vph, a 50-hour reserve, METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance, which gives it the clearer modern performance credentials and stronger anti-magnetic robustness. In practical enthusiast terms, the Breitling feels more mechanically elaborate and more autonomous day to day, while the Omega is the more technically specified movement for durability in modern environments. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
The Breitling is 41mm wide, 13.6mm thick, 47mm lug-to-lug, and 153g, while the Omega is 42mm wide, 13.18mm thick, 47.5mm lug-to-lug, and 138g. That means the Breitling is fractionally shorter and a touch more compact in footprint, but the Omega is lighter and slightly slimmer on paper, which should help it feel easier over long wear. The Navitimer wearability notes emphasize that the 41mm size tones down the oversized feel of older versions while preserving strong wrist presence; despite its busy dial, it wears more elegantly than many sports chronographs. The Moonwatch notes describe it as wearing closer to a compact sports chronograph than its dimensions imply, with the bracelet making a major comfort improvement. Overall, the Breitling has the more purposeful, wrist-commanding presence, while the Omega is the easier all-day wear for a wider range of wrist sizes. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
The Breitling offers a highly distinctive pilot chronograph experience with a bidirectional slide-rule bezel, cambered sapphire crystal with glareproofing on both sides, a date display, and a polished, refined presentation. However, its water resistance is only 30m, and the wearability notes explicitly call it more delicate than a typical sports chronograph. The Omega is much more straightforward in daily use: black dial, Super-LumiNova, tachymeter bezel, sapphire crystal, no date to interrupt symmetry, and 50m water resistance. Its display caseback and Master Chronometer movement add enthusiast appeal, while the bracelet’s taper and micro-adjust make it especially practical. For legibility, lume, and everyday utility, the Omega is the more usable watch; for mechanical interaction and aviation-specific character, the Breitling is more emotionally engaging. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
The Breitling carries a higher MSRP at $10,700 versus $9,000 for the Omega. Both are stainless-steel chronograph icons, but the Breitling’s stronger brand signal here is its deep aviation heritage and highly specialized slide-rule identity, while the Omega brings the Moonwatch’s unmatched space-history context and the added technical credibility of METAS certification and anti-magnetism. Ownership practicality favors the Omega because of its lighter weight, better water resistance, simpler legibility, and more versatile use case. The Breitling feels more special and collectible for enthusiasts who want a heritage-heavy conversation piece, but it is the less forgiving watch to live with. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
Compared
AB0139211B1A1
310.30.42.50.01.002