Breitling Premier B09 Chronograph 40
AB0930D31L1P1
- Case
- 40mm
- MSRP
- $9,950
- Movement
- Mechanical hand-wound
- Reserve
- 70h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
AB0930D31L1P1
M79360N-0012
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who enjoy hand-wound movement interaction
Where it wins
Buyers who want the more capable daily-wear sports chronograph
The Tudor uses the automatic MT5813 with 70 hours of power reserve and COSC certification, giving it a set-and-forget ownership experience and a robust, modern sports-chrono profile. The Breitling uses the manual-wind B09 manufacture caliber, also COSC-certified with 70 hours of power reserve and 28 jewels; its 28,800 vph beat rate and hand-wound architecture make it more interactive and mechanically romantic. On paper, the Breitling has the more enthusiast-baiting movement because it is a manufacture hand-wound chronograph with display-back appeal, while the Tudor is arguably the more practical daily companion thanks to automatic winding and screw-down crown/pushers. Serviceability and long-term reliability are not explicitly detailed beyond the provided movement descriptions, so they cannot be ranked decisively. Winner: Tie
The Tudor is 41 mm across and 14.4 mm thick, with an overall wearability note saying it wears more compact than the numbers suggest, but it is still substantial and can feel top-heavy on smaller wrists. The Breitling is slightly smaller at 40 mm and notably slimmer at 13.08 mm, with a listed weight of 93.5 g and a 20 mm strap width that should help it feel more balanced and contained on wrist. The Tudor’s 22 mm bracelet and T-fit clasp with 8 mm of tool-less micro-adjustment improve practical fit flexibility, especially during temperature changes. Based on the listed dimensions and wear notes, the Breitling is the easier watch to wear elegantly, while the Tudor has more wrist presence and a sportier, more substantial footprint. Winner: Breitling Premier B09 Chronograph 40
The Tudor offers a domed sapphire crystal, opaline dial with black counters, 200 m water resistance, and a screw-down crown, which make it the more capable everyday sports watch. Its 3-link steel bracelet and T-fit clasp further improve day-to-day usability and make it more versatile for active wear. The Breitling counters with a cambered sapphire crystal, glareproofing on both sides, a screwed-in sapphire caseback, and a clean bicompax chronograph layout, but it is only rated to 100 m and comes on a gold brown alligator strap, which makes it feel dressier and less adaptable for rough use or casual sport. The Breitling’s hand-wound movement adds character, but from a pure daily practicality standpoint the Tudor is more rugged, more versatile, and better equipped for spontaneous wear. Winner: Tudor Black Bay Chrono
The Tudor has a substantially lower listed MSRP at USD 6,875 versus USD 9,950 for the Breitling, while also bringing COSC certification, 200 m water resistance, and a steel bracelet with micro-adjustable clasp. The Breitling’s higher price is supported by its manufacture B09 hand-wound movement, display caseback, elegant execution, and more refined dress-chrono character, but the data does not provide additional brand-heritage or maintenance-cost details to justify a stronger value claim. From a collector’s standpoint, the Tudor offers the stronger blend of capability, price, and modern ownership practicality, while the Breitling is the more specialized and emotionally expressive choice. Winner: Tudor Black Bay Chrono
Compared
AB0930D31L1P1
M79360N-0012