Breitling Superocean Automatic 42
A17375211B1A1
- Case
- 42mm
- MSRP
- $5,700
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 38h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
A17375211B1A1
217.30.42.21.01.001
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Collectors who prefer a lighter, slimmer-feeling 42mm diver
Where it wins
Buyers who prioritize technical superiority and modern movement credentials
Breitling uses the Breitling 17 automatic with 26 jewels, 28,800 vph, and a 38-hour power reserve. Omega uses the Omega 8912 automatic with 39 jewels, 25,200 vph, a 60-hour power reserve, METAS certification, and listed 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance. Based on the provided data, the Omega movement is significantly more technically sophisticated and better specified for long-term modern ownership, while the Breitling is the more straightforward, conventional caliber. Serviceability is not specifically listed for either, but the Breitling’s simpler movement may appeal to buyers who prefer less complexity. Winner: Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M
Both watches are 42mm, so their wrist presence starts from the same headline size, but the case shapes differ meaningfully. The Breitling is 12.56mm thick, 47.7mm lug-to-lug, and 175g, while the Omega is 13.79mm thick, 47.5mm lug-to-lug, and 177g. That makes the Breitling marginally slimmer and very slightly lighter, which should translate to a touch more ease under a cuff and a less blocky feel on wrist. The Omega’s broader technical profile comes with a thicker, more substantial presence, though the updated bracelet and comfort setting help balance it. Wearability notes also support this: the Breitling is described as especially comfortable and balanced for its sporty presence, while the Omega is said to be much improved over older Planet Oceans but still wears larger and thicker than slimmer dive icons. Winner: Breitling Superocean Automatic 42
The Breitling emphasizes highly legible, fun, vintage-inspired dive-watch readability with strong lume and a clean, simplified tool-watch character. Its 300m water resistance is ample for daily aquatic use, and the unidirectional ratcheted bezel, cambered sapphire, and screw-locked crown support practical diving and general robustness. The Omega offers a black dial, Super-LumiNova, ceramic bezel, domed sapphire with inside AR coating, helium escape valve, 600m water resistance, and a transparent caseback. It is more advanced on paper and more capable for serious water use, with better technical redundancy and a more refined bracelet/clasp package including diver extension and comfort setting. For pure everyday practicality, the Breitling is a bit easiergoing and less aggressive, but the Omega is more versatile from a function-and-spec standpoint. Winner: Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M
The Breitling lists an MSRP of $5,700, while the Omega lists $9,200, so the Breitling is the more accessible entry into this tier of luxury diver. The Breitling also has a strong enthusiast-friendly identity: a cleaner modern Superocean, vintage Slow Motion lineage, and a rugged, casual personality that many collectors find appealing. The Omega brings stronger technical credentials, METAS certification, 15,000 gauss resistance, 600m water resistance, and a more premium-feeling feature set, but it does so at a much higher listed price. Ownership practicality favors the Breitling on cost, while the Omega better satisfies buyers who place a premium on movement technology and top-end dive-watch engineering. Winner: Breitling Superocean Automatic 42
Compared
A17375211B1A1
217.30.42.21.01.001