Breitling Top Time B31
AB3113281A1X1
- Case
- 38mm
- MSRP
- $5,850
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 78h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
AB3113281A1X1
220.10.38.20.01.004
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Buyers who prioritize thinness, light weight, and effortless comfort
Where it wins
Wins for buyers who prefer its overall mix of specs, fit, ownership appeal, and value.
Omega’s caliber 8800 is the more technically ambitious movement on paper: automatic, 55-hour power reserve, METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance. It also runs at 3.5 Hz / 25,200 vph and is shown through a transparent caseback, which adds enthusiast appeal. Breitling’s manufacture caliber B31 is also automatic and has the longer stated power reserve at 78 hours, with a higher 28,800 vph beat rate, but the provided data does not list certification or magnetic resistance for it. Because Omega offers more listed performance and anti-magnetic robustness, while Breitling counters with longer reserve, the stronger overall technical package is Omega. Winner: Omega
Both watches are 38mm, so both sit in the modern sweet spot for many enthusiasts. Omega is thicker at 12.26mm and substantially heavier at 133g, with a 45.1mm lug-to-lug, so it should wear more substantial and present more like a true steel sports watch. Breitling is much thinner at 10.31mm and dramatically lighter at 65.84g, which should make it feel more effortless and less wrist-fatiguing for long wear; however, its lug-to-lug is not listed, so that part of the fit picture is incomplete. The Omega wearability notes describe it as especially well balanced for medium or smaller wrists, compact without feeling small. The Breitling notes say it lands in the sweet spot for small to medium wrists while still looking intentional on larger wrists. For pure comfort and low-profile wear, Breitling has the edge; for a more substantial, classic sports-watch presence, Omega wins. Winner: Breitling
Omega is the more complete daily-wear tool on the listed specs: black lacquer dial, white Super-LumiNova, anti-reflective sapphire crystal, 150m water resistance, screw-in crown, date, and a steel bracelet with butterfly clasp and comfort setting. The wearability notes reinforce that it blends luxury finishing with real everyday capability, and its anti-magnetic movement broadens practical use around modern devices. Breitling has a sapphire crystal, 100m water resistance, date, and a straight calfskin strap with tang buckle, which makes it more relaxed and style-forward, but the provided data does not list lume, crown type, or any anti-magnetic or certification details. Its lighter weight and thinner case improve everyday comfort, yet the strap and more lifestyle-oriented presentation make it less clearly all-purpose than the Omega. For legibility, durability, and versatile daily use, Omega is the stronger package. Winner: Omega
At MSRP, Breitling is lower at $5,850 versus Omega at $7,400, so it offers the more accessible entry price. Omega counters with stronger listed heritage signals for technical luxury: the Seamaster Aqua Terra line, METAS certification, 15,000 gauss anti-magnetism, exhibition caseback, and a steel-bracelet sports-watch format that reads as very complete. Breitling’s value case is more about design character, the new manufacture B31, and the appeal of a thinner, lighter, vintage-leaning everyday watch; the provided data does not include comparable certification or anti-magnetic claims. If value means strongest spec-for-dollar and ownership practicality in a robust steel sports watch, Omega is the more compelling enthusiast proposition despite the higher MSRP. If value means lower buy-in and a distinctive, comfortable style piece, Breitling has appeal. Winner: Omega
Compared
AB3113281A1X1
220.10.38.20.01.004