Breitling Top Time B31
AB3113281A1X1
- Case
- 38mm
- MSRP
- $5,850
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 78h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
AB3113281A1X1
220.12.41.21.06.001
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Collectors who value comfort, lighter weight, and a compact case
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who prioritize movement technology, anti-magnetic protection, and go-anywhere utility
Omega’s caliber 8900 is the more technically robust movement on paper: automatic, 3.5 Hz, 60-hour power reserve, METAS-certified, and rated for 15,000 gauss of magnetic resistance. That combination is especially compelling for owners who want real-world resilience and a movement with strong anti-magnetic credentials. Breitling’s B31 is also automatic and offers a longer 78-hour power reserve at 28,800 vph, which is attractive for convenience and likely means a smoother seconds hand sweep, but the provided data does not list equivalent certification or magnetic-resistance credentials. On listed specs, Omega wins for technical sophistication and long-term confidence; Breitling wins only on power reserve. Winner: Omega Aqua Terra 150M 41mm Grey on Rubber
The Breitling is dramatically easier to wear in pure dimensional terms: 38mm diameter, 10.31mm thickness, 65.84g weight, and a 20/18 tapered strap make it the smaller, slimmer, lighter watch. Its pre-existing wearability note also emphasizes that it lands in a sweet spot for small to medium wrists while still working on larger wrists, with strong everyday comfort. The Omega is 41mm by 13.2mm, 47.9mm lug-to-lug, and 108g, so it will have notably more wrist presence and a more substantial sport-watch feel; its wearability note says the case can wear a bit broad for smaller wrists, especially with the longer lug profile common to modern Aqua Terras. If you want compact comfort and less physical bulk, Breitling is clearly superior. Winner: Breitling Top Time B31
The Omega has the better fully specified everyday toolkit: grey horizontal teak-pattern dial, White Super-LumiNova, anti-reflective sapphire crystal on both sides, 150m water resistance, date display, and a sport-ready rubber strap. Its wearability note adds that the blued hands and indexes, strong finishing, and practical jumping-hour hand make it work well for travel and most environments. The Breitling brings a date and 100m water resistance, plus a sapphire crystal and a calfskin strap, but the data does not list lume, dial details, or anti-reflective coating. That makes it harder to judge legibility and outright utility from the provided specs alone, and the leather strap is inherently less water-friendly than the Omega’s rubber. Breitling clearly has a more lifestyle-oriented, vintage-inspired character, but Omega is the more practical everyday watch. Winner: Omega Aqua Terra 150M 41mm Grey on Rubber
The Breitling is lower in MSRP at $5,850 versus Omega’s $6,800, which gives it a straightforward price advantage. Breitling also offers a genuine manufacture caliber and a highly wearable design, while Omega brings stronger heritage signals from the Aqua Terra line, METAS certification, 15,000 gauss resistance, and a more explicitly overbuilt ownership profile. For durability and low-hassle ownership, Omega’s movement and water resistance are easier to justify; for a less expensive entry into an enthusiast-grade automatic with a strong style identity, Breitling is appealing. Because both have meaningful collector interest but different emphases, the value call is close, with Omega just ahead if technical substance matters most. Winner: Omega Aqua Terra 150M 41mm Grey on Rubber
Compared
AB3113281A1X1
220.12.41.21.06.001