Bremont Supermarine 500M Polar White
SM43-DT-SS-WH-B
- Case
- 43mm
- MSRP
- $4,350
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 56h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
SM43-DT-SS-WH-B
A17375211B1A1
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Buyers who want the stronger spec sheet and more serious dive-watch credentials
Where it wins
Enthusiasts prioritizing comfort, compactness, and easy everyday wear
The Breitling uses the Breitling 17 automatic caliber with 26 jewels, 28,800 vph, and a 38-hour power reserve. The Bremont uses the BB64AH automatic caliber with 25 jewels, 28,800 vph, and a 56-hour power reserve. Based on the listed data, Bremont has the clearer edge in autonomy and practical convenience, while both are standard automatic movements at the same beat rate and neither has listed accuracy claims or certification data. Serviceability and long-term reliability are not explicitly listed for either watch, though the simpler, conventional architecture suggests broadly straightforward ownership for both. Winner: Bremont Supermarine 500M Polar White
The Breitling is 42mm across, 12.56mm thick, 47.7mm lug-to-lug, and 175g, while the Bremont is 43mm across, 13mm thick, and 50mm lug-to-lug with weight not listed. On paper the Breitling is the more compact and likely more versatile fit, especially for smaller to medium wrists, and the lower weight should help it disappear more easily in daily wear. The Bremont has the larger wrist presence and a more substantial dive-watch stance, which can be appealing on larger wrists but may feel bigger in practice. Wearability notes support this: the Breitling is described as offering excellent everyday comfort despite its sporty presence, while the Bremont is described as large and bold but improved in comfort thanks to a slimmer case profile and upgraded bracelet. Winner: Breitling Superocean Automatic 42
The Breitling leans into high legibility, broad hands, oversized lume plots, a cambered sapphire crystal with double-sided glareproofing, and a unidirectional ratcheted bezel; its 300m water resistance is solid for daily swimming and recreational dive use. The Bremont brings a white 3D wave-pattern dial, black gold hands, strong lume, domed anti-reflective sapphire crystal, a date display, helium escape valve, screw-down crown, and 500m water resistance, making it the more technically overbuilt daily diver. The Breitling’s dial is praised as exceptionally readable and its design is easier to enjoy in casual settings, while the Bremont’s white dial and black bezel create stronger contrast and a more modern visual punch. On practicality, Bremont has the edge in water resistance and feature set; Breitling has the edge in simplicity, lighter wear, and broad everyday versatility. Winner: Bremont Supermarine 500M Polar White
The Breitling carries a higher MSRP at USD 5,700 versus USD 4,350 for the Bremont, so Bremont is the easier value proposition on price alone. Brand and heritage signals are stronger and more clearly articulated in the Breitling data, which connects the Superocean to the 1960s Slow Motion dive-watch lineage; that gives it stronger collector-romantic appeal. Bremont’s value case is driven more by specification density: 904L steel, 500m water resistance, helium escape valve, longer power reserve, and a more modern execution at a lower MSRP. Ownership practicality slightly favors the Bremont if you prioritize spec-for-dollar, while the Breitling may appeal more to collectors who value the heritage story and the more distinctive design identity. Winner: Bremont Supermarine 500M Polar White
Compared
SM43-DT-SS-WH-B
A17375211B1A1