Bremont Supernova Chronograph 41mm on Bracelet
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B
- Case
- 41mm
- MSRP
- $8,250
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 62h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B
AB0134101B1A1
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who prioritize lighter wear, shorter lug-to-lug, and a more comfortable integrated-bracelet fit
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want the stronger all-around luxury chronograph package and a more established collector signal
Both watches use automatic chronograph movements running at 28,800 vph, but the Breitling’s in-house Breitling 01 manufacture caliber has the stronger enthusiast reputation and a notably longer 70-hour power reserve. The Bremont BC77AC is COSC-certified, which is a meaningful technical credential, but the provided data does not list the Breitling’s certification status, so that point cannot be compared directly. Breitling’s 47 jewels versus Bremont’s 27 does not automatically mean better performance, but it does underline the B01’s more complex architecture. On listed data, the Breitling offers the more mature and widely respected movement package, while Bremont adds the reassurance of chronometer certification. Winner: Breitling Chronomat B01 42
The Breitling is larger on paper at 42mm x 15.1mm x 50.5mm and 198g, so it will wear with more mass, more wrist presence, and a clearly substantial luxury-sport feel. The Bremont is slightly smaller at 41mm x 14.4mm x 48.7mm and only 106g, which should make it noticeably easier to wear for smaller wrists and for anyone sensitive to heft. The Chronomat’s pre-existing wearability note says it wears more comfortably than its dimensions suggest thanks to the compact lug-to-lug and integrated feel of the bracelet, though it still reads as bold and heavy on wrist. The Supernova note emphasizes that its angular case looks aggressive but is actually more wearable than expected because of the sub-49mm lug-to-lug and integrated bracelet. For pure comfort and broader wrist versatility, Bremont has the edge; for presence and a more commanding fit, Breitling wins. Winner: Bremont Supernova Chronograph 41mm on Bracelet
The Breitling offers better water resistance at 200m versus Bremont’s 100m, making it the more practical choice for swimming and more demanding everyday use. Its cambered, glareproofed sapphire crystal and unidirectional ratcheted bezel reinforce a more tool-oriented sports character, while the Chronomat’s tri-compax chronograph layout and strong bracelet identity give it broad day-to-day appeal. The Bremont counters with a black galvanic dial, domed anti-reflective sapphire, DLC black case middle, black ceramic bezel ring, and a fully lumed underlayer per the wearability notes, which should make it visually striking and legible in varied lighting. Its lighter construction makes it easier for all-day wear, but the butterfly clasp and absence of confirmed micro-adjustment make it less adaptable in small fit changes. Overall, the Breitling is the more versatile everyday sports watch, while the Bremont is the more design-forward and lightweight choice. Winner: Breitling Chronomat B01 42
The Bremont has the lower listed MSRP at $8,250 versus Breitling’s $9,550, which gives it an immediate price advantage. The Breitling, however, comes with stronger heritage signals in the provided data: the Chronomat has a long enthusiast history, a distinctive and recognized sports-chronograph identity, and a manufacture movement with a broader reputation among collectors. Bremont’s Supernova feels more niche and more experimental, which can be appealing to collectors who want something newer and less common in style, but the provided data does not establish comparable historical depth. In ownership terms, the Bremont’s lighter build and COSC certification are attractive, while the Breitling’s 200m resistance and established B01 platform suggest a more conventional long-term luxury sports watch experience. On balance, the Breitling appears to offer the stronger collector and heritage package, while Bremont offers more aggressive pricing and modern distinctiveness. Winner: Breitling Chronomat B01 42
Compared
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B
AB0134101B1A1