DOXA SUB 200T Whitepearl
804.10.011.10
- Case
- 39mm
- MSRP
- $1,790
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 38h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
804.10.011.10
M7939A1A0NU-0001
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who prioritize compact wearability and a lighter wrist feel
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want the stronger movement, longer power reserve, and better documented performance
The DOXA uses an automatic Sellita SW200-1, running at 4 Hz with a 38-hour power reserve. The Tudor uses the automatic MT5400-U with a 65-hour power reserve, COSC and METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance, which gives it a clear technical advantage on paper and more confidence for long, varied wear. The DOXA’s movement is a proven, straightforward workhorse, but the Tudor adds better documented performance standards, stronger anti-magnetic protection, and much greater autonomy between windings. For enthusiast appeal, the Tudor feels more modern and more fully engineered, while the DOXA is simpler and likely easier to accept as a classic, no-frills Swiss automatic. Winner: Tudor Black Bay 58
Both watches are 39mm, but they wear differently. The DOXA is thinner at 10.7mm with a very short 41.5mm lug-to-lug and an 18mm lug width, which should make it exceptionally compact and easy to place on smaller wrists; the pre-existing wearability notes describe it as noticeably more wearable than the larger SUB 300T and one of the most approachable watches in the modern DOXA lineup. The Tudor is 11.7mm thick with a 20mm lug width, and the wearability notes emphasize its excellent proportions, slim feel, and balanced presence on wrist, though the lug-to-lug is not yet listed. The Tudor’s T-fit clasp and five-link bracelet also improve on-wrist adaptability, while the DOXA’s beads-of-rice bracelet contributes character but is described as more utilitarian at the clasp. For outright compactness and lighter-looking presence, the DOXA has the edge; for refined fit engineering and broader wrist adaptability, the Tudor is stronger. Winner: DOXA SUB 200T Whitepearl
The DOXA offers a white sunray-finished dial with Super-LumiNova, a sapphire crystal with anti-reflective coating, a screw-down crown, 200m water resistance, and the signature DOXA dive bezel with an integrated US Navy no-decompression limit table. That combination makes it highly legible, distinctly tool-like, and visually brighter and more modern than the traditional orange DOXA look, though the polished and lighter presentation can feel less rugged. The Tudor uses a matte black dial with applied hour markers, a domed sapphire crystal, a unidirectional bezel with anodised aluminium insert, 200m water resistance, and no date, which supports clean symmetry and strong everyday versatility. Its lume is not yet listed, but the movement and bracelet package are notably more polished, and the T-fit clasp is a practical advantage for daily comfort. The DOXA feels more specialized and visually striking; the Tudor is more refined, more versatile, and better supported by its bracelet and clasp system. Winner: Tudor Black Bay 58
The DOXA’s MSRP is $1,790, while the Tudor’s MSRP is $5,350, so the DOXA is the far lower-cost entry into the category. In ownership terms, the DOXA pairs a proven Sellita movement with a straightforward steel case and bracelet, which makes it easy to understand as a durable, classic dive watch with strong brand identity. The Tudor asks far more, but the data supports a more substantial package: METAS/COSC certification, stronger magnetic resistance, a longer power reserve, a refined bracelet with T-fit, and a brand position that carries strong enthusiast recognition. Collector appeal also differs: DOXA offers a more niche, historically flavored personality and a brighter, more distinctive dial concept, while Tudor offers broader prestige and a more fully developed luxury-tool-watch specification set. On pure spec-for-dollar, DOXA wins; on ownership polish and technical substance, Tudor justifies more of its premium. Winner: DOXA SUB 200T Whitepearl
Compared
804.10.011.10
M7939A1A0NU-0001