Longines Conquest Sunray Black Dial 38mm
L3.720.4.52.6
- Case
- 38mm
- MSRP
- $2,400
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 72h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
L3.720.4.52.6
M2639W1A0U-0001
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Buyers prioritizing comfort, slimmer proportions, and easy all-day wear
Where it wins
Collectors who value METAS/COSC certification, anti-magnetic performance, and a more advanced movement story
Longines uses the automatic L888.5 with a 72-hour power reserve and a 3.5 Hz / 25,200 vph beat rate, which suggests a conventional, reliable daily-wear movement focused on practical endurance. Tudor uses the automatic MT5662-2U with a 65-hour power reserve, COSC and METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance, which gives it a clear technical edge and more enthusiast-grade credibility. The Longines offers more reserve on paper, but the Tudor brings significantly stronger stated performance credentials and higher-end movement positioning. Winner: Tudor Monarch
Longines is the more compact watch at 38mm wide, 10.9mm thick, 46.8mm lug-to-lug, and 122.7g, with a 19mm bracelet that tapers to 16mm. The wearability summary describes it as one of the strongest modern everyday sports watches because of its balanced proportions, slim profile, and comfortable bracelet taper. Tudor is slightly larger at 39mm and 11.9mm thick, with a 20mm lug width, but its lug-to-lug and weight are not yet listed, so a full fit comparison is limited. Its wearability summary emphasizes a refined, premium feel and excellent everyday size range, aided by a sharply tapered bracelet and T-Fit clasp. Based on the listed dimensions, Longines is the easier and more universally approachable fit, while Tudor likely wears more substantial and architectural. Winner: Longines Conquest Sunray Black Dial 38mm
Longines offers a sunray black dial with applied indexes and Swiss Super-LumiNova, plus several layers of anti-reflective coating on both sides of the sapphire crystal, which should make it very legible and visually adaptable in different lighting. It also has 100m water resistance, a screw-in crown, and a stainless steel bracelet with a triple folding clasp, making it a very practical all-rounder, though the clasp lacks on-the-fly micro-adjustment. Tudor’s dark champagne dial with applied hour markers is more distinctive, and the watch adds METAS certification, COSC certification, 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance, a T-fit clasp, and 100m water resistance. However, lume is not yet listed for Tudor, and the dial layout is more polarizing and less obviously tool-like. For daily practicality, Longines is the more balanced and legible conventional choice, while Tudor is the more capable and more specialized-feeling package. Winner: Longines Conquest Sunray Black Dial 38mm
Longines has a much lower MSRP at $2,400 and comes from a brand with strong mainstream luxury recognition and a well-established Conquest sports-watch lineage. Its ownership case is simple: stainless steel construction, 100m water resistance, and a broadly versatile design that should suit many wardrobes and settings. Tudor’s MSRP is $5,875, reflecting a more expensive steel-and-titanium build, certification stack, anti-magnetic performance, and a more original design language. From a collector perspective, Tudor offers more technical prestige and niche appeal; from a practical value standpoint, Longines delivers a very compelling specification-to-price ratio. Winner: Longines Conquest Sunray Black Dial 38mm
Compared
L3.720.4.52.6
M2639W1A0U-0001