Longines HydroConquest GMT Sunray Blue
L3.790.4.96.6
- Case
- 41mm
- MSRP
- $3,350
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 72h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
L3.790.4.96.6
M79680-0001
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Travelers who will use the GMT hand and local-hour functionality
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want the stronger movement pedigree and a more upscale everyday luxury presence
The Tudor uses the MT5601 automatic caliber with 70 hours of power reserve and COSC certification, which gives it a clear technical credential advantage on the listed data. The Longines L844.5 automatic offers a slightly longer 72-hour power reserve and a 3.5 Hz / 25,200 vph operating rate, plus GMT functionality, but it is not listed as COSC-certified. In practical terms, the Tudor has the stronger listed assurance of chronometric pedigree, while the Longines has the more travel-oriented movement package. Serviceability and long-term reliability are not specified for either beyond the listed specs. Winner: Tudor Black Bay 41
Both watches are 41mm, so diameter alone does not separate them. The Tudor is 12.2mm thick, but lug-to-lug and weight are not yet listed, so its fit has to be judged from the wearability notes: it wears larger than the Black Bay 39, has strong wrist presence, and benefits from an excellent T-Fit clasp and articulated bracelet. The Longines is 12.9mm thick with a 49.4mm lug-to-lug, 21mm lugs, and a listed weight of 181.4g; the wearability notes say it feels slimmer and more balanced than the specs suggest, helped by the tapered bracelet and compact ergonomics. For smaller or medium wrists, the Longines has more precise fit data and may be easier to predict; the Tudor will feel a bit more substantial and premium on-wrist, but potentially larger. Winner: Longines HydroConquest GMT Sunray Blue
The Tudor leans toward understated versatility: anthracite dial, flat sapphire, 100m water resistance, no date, and a polished/satin steel bracelet with T-Fit clasp. Its wearability notes emphasize that it works well from casual to business attire and has a subtle, shifting dial character, but it is less overtly tool-oriented. The Longines is more feature-rich for daily use: sunray blue dial, applied indexes, Super-LumiNova, AR coating on both sides, ceramic unidirectional bezel, 300m water resistance, date display, GMT complication, and a double-security clasp with micro-adjustment. Those specs make it better for legibility, travel, and active wear, while still looking elevated rather than purely utilitarian. For pure everyday practicality and functionality, the Longines has the richer toolkit. Winner: Longines HydroConquest GMT Sunray Blue
The Tudor carries the higher MSRP at $4,825 versus $3,350 for the Longines. On the listed data, Tudor’s value case rests on the in-house COSC-certified movement, the T-Fit clasp, and the stronger brand-heritage signal of the Black Bay line; it reads as the more premium collector piece. Longines offers more specification per dollar in tangible ownership terms: GMT complication, 300m water resistance, ceramic bezel, AR coating, date, and a highly usable clasp system. Durability expectations favor Longines slightly on paper because of the higher water resistance and tool-watch architecture, though maintenance costs and service behavior are not listed. For enthusiast value, the Longines is the stronger feature-to-price proposition, while the Tudor has the more collectible luxury-sport cachet. Winner: Longines HydroConquest GMT Sunray Blue
Compared
L3.790.4.96.6
M79680-0001