Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
310.30.42.50.01.004
- Case
- 42mm
- MSRP
- $10,400
- Movement
- Manual
- Reserve
- 50h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
310.30.42.50.01.004
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Collectors who prioritize icon status, technical certification, and broad enthusiast credibility
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who prefer modern integrated-sports styling and a more contemporary presence
The Omega uses the manual-wind Omega 3861 with 50 hours of power reserve, 3 Hz frequency, 26 jewels, METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance. The Bremont uses the automatic BC77AC with 62 hours of power reserve, 4 Hz frequency, 27 jewels, and COSC certification. On paper, Bremont offers the more modern automatic architecture, higher beat rate, and longer reserve, while Omega brings the more technically distinctive certification package and exceptional anti-magnetism, which is a meaningful real-world advantage. Serviceability and long-term reliability are not explicitly listed, but the Omega’s METAS-backed spec set is the more compelling technical statement overall. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
The Omega is 42mm by 13.54mm with a 47.5mm lug-to-lug and 142g weight; the Bremont is slightly smaller at 41mm but thicker at 14.4mm, longer at 48.7mm lug-to-lug, and much lighter at 106g. In practice, the Omega’s shorter lug-to-lug and updated bracelet design should make it feel more compact and settled, especially since the provided wearability notes say it wears closer to a compact 40mm sports chronograph and that the bracelet/clasp improve comfort noticeably. The Bremont’s lower weight should help comfort, but its integrated case geometry and longer lug-to-lug may make it feel more substantial than its diameter suggests, and its wearability notes point to a sleeker but less adjustable fit. For wrist presence, the Bremont will look more architectural and the Omega more classic-compact. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
The Omega has the advantage in legibility-oriented everyday use with a black-and-white reverse panda dial, Super-LumiNova, sapphire crystal with inside anti-reflective treatment, a 50m rating, and a proven chronograph layout. Its steel bracelet, taper, and comfort-setting clasp add practical wearability, while the METAS-certified movement and high magnetic resistance support daily reliability. The Bremont offers a more contemporary black galvanic dial, domed AR sapphire crystal, a date display, COSC-certified automatic movement, and better 100m water resistance, which makes it more versatile for water exposure and less tedious to live with thanks to automatic winding. However, the lack of listed lume is a notable practical gap, and its bracelet details and adjustability are less clearly documented. For all-around legibility and tool-watch usefulness, Omega wins; for water resistance and convenience, Bremont closes the gap but does not fully surpass it. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
The Bremont has the lower MSRP at $8,250 versus the Omega at $10,400, so it is the easier entry on price. That said, the Omega carries stronger heritage signals in the supplied data through the Speedmaster Moonwatch identity, a transparent caseback, METAS certification, and the highly recognizable Moonwatch format, all of which strengthen collector appeal and ownership satisfaction. Bremont’s value case comes from its 904L steel construction, DLC mid-case, ceramic bezel ring, COSC-certified movement, and distinctive integrated design, which may appeal to buyers prioritizing materials and originality over legacy. Maintenance expectations and resale behavior are not listed, so they cannot be compared directly. On the provided data alone, the Omega offers the more compelling long-term enthusiast package despite the higher MSRP. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional
Compared
310.30.42.50.01.004
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B