Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
310.30.42.50.01.002
- Case
- 42mm
- MSRP
- $9,000
- Movement
- Manual
- Reserve
- 50h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
310.30.42.50.01.002
AB0134101B1A1
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want the most iconic and historically meaningful chronograph of the pair
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want automatic convenience and a longer power reserve
The Omega uses the manual-wind Calibre 3861, which aligns with the traditional Moonwatch experience and brings modern upgrades like METAS certification and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance. It also has a 50-hour power reserve, which is solid for a hand-wound chronograph, and the transparent caseback adds enthusiast appeal by showing the movement. The Breitling uses the automatic in-house B01, with a longer 70-hour power reserve and 47 jewels, which makes it more convenient for daily rotation and more technically elaborate on paper. The Breitling also benefits from a reputation in the data for smooth chronograph action and strong reliability, while the Omega stands out for anti-magnetism and Master Chronometer certification. Winner: Tie
Both watches are 42mm, but they wear quite differently. The Omega is thinner at 13.18mm, shorter at 47.5mm lug-to-lug, and much lighter at 138g, so it should feel more compact and less fatiguing over long wear. Its overall wearability note specifically says it wears closer to a compact sports chronograph than the dimensions suggest, and the redesigned bracelet with its 2.3mm micro-adjust adds meaningful comfort. The Breitling is thicker at 15.1mm, longer at 50.5mm lug-to-lug, and significantly heavier at 198g, giving it much stronger wrist presence and a more substantial feel. Its wearability note says it can still wear comfortably thanks to the relatively compact lug-to-lug and integrated bracelet feel, but it is clearly the larger-feeling watch. For smaller wrists or anyone sensitive to weight, the Omega is easier to live with; for those who like heft and presence, the Breitling delivers more substance. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
The Omega has a black dial, Super-LumiNova, a sapphire crystal, and a tachymeter bezel, making it the more classic and legibility-focused chronograph, though the listed data does not provide dial texture or index details. Its 50m water resistance is adequate for daily life but keeps it in classic chronograph territory rather than true sports-watch territory. The Breitling adds a date display, cambered glareproofed sapphire, a unidirectional ratcheted bezel, screw-locked crown, and 200m water resistance, which makes it far more versatile for rougher daily use, travel, and water exposure. However, the listed data does not include dial color or lume for the Breitling, so its low-light legibility cannot be evaluated as directly from the provided specs. The Omega is more heritage-driven and visually restrained; the Breitling is more robust and practical in a wider range of environments. Winner: Breitling Chronomat B01 42
The Omega carries a lower MSRP at $9,000 versus $9,550 for the Breitling, and the data strongly supports its value proposition through the Moonwatch’s heritage, METAS certification, anti-magnetic capability, and highly regarded modernized execution. Its ownership experience is also appealing for enthusiasts who want a historically important watch that remains versatile and manageable on the wrist. The Breitling justifies its price with its in-house B01 movement, 70-hour reserve, 200m water resistance, and more luxurious, substantial build, but it is a heavier and more overtly styled proposition. From a collector standpoint, the Omega has the stronger heritage signal in the provided data, while the Breitling offers a compelling modern luxury chronograph identity. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional Master Chronometer
Compared
310.30.42.50.01.002
AB0134101B1A1