Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional White Dial
310.30.42.50.04.001
- Case
- 42mm
- MSRP
- $9,100
- Movement
- Manual
- Reserve
- 50h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
310.30.42.50.04.001
AB0930D31L1P1
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who want the stronger all-around sports chronograph package
Where it wins
Collectors who prefer manual-wind engagement and a dressier chronograph
The Omega uses the manual-wind Omega 3861, with 50 hours of power reserve, 26 jewels, 3 Hz / 21,600 vph, METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance. The Breitling uses the mechanical hand-wound Breitling B09 manufacture caliber, with 70 hours of power reserve, 28 jewels, 4 Hz / 28,800 vph, and COSC certification. On listed technical credentials, the Breitling has the longer reserve and higher beat rate, while the Omega adds METAS and much stronger magnetic resistance, which is a meaningful real-world advantage for reliability in modern environments. Both are manual chronographs, so both offer the tactile appeal enthusiasts want; the Breitling’s B09/B01-architecture background gives it strong enthusiast cachet, while the Omega’s 3861 is the more explicitly robust and anti-magnetic proposition. Winner: Omega
The Omega is 42 mm in diameter, 13.2 mm thick, 47.5 mm lug-to-lug, 20 mm lug width, and 140 g on bracelet. Its wearability summary notes that the case wears smaller than the specs suggest, with the short lug-to-lug and twisted-lug shape helping balance on wrist, while the updated bracelet improves comfort significantly. The Breitling is 40 mm in diameter, 13.08 mm thick, 20 mm lug width, and 93.5 g on a leather strap, but lug-to-lug is not yet listed. Its wearability summary emphasizes a compact, balanced 40 mm profile and a thinner visual presence through the display caseback; the lighter weight will be immediately noticeable in daily wear. On pure size and lightness, the Breitling is easier to wear for more wrists, though the Omega still has excellent proportions for a 42 mm sports chronograph. Winner: Breitling
The Omega offers a white dial with Super-LumiNova, tachymeter bezel, sapphire crystal with inside AR, 50 m water resistance, a steel bracelet, and a 2.3 mm easy-adjust clasp. Its white-dial design is described as highly legible with strong contrast, and the bracelet is a standout for everyday practicality. The Breitling has no dial color or lume listed, but it does have a cambered sapphire crystal glareproofed on both sides, 100 m water resistance, a fixed bezel, a curved alligator strap, and a folding clasp. That makes it more water-capable on paper, but less universally practical for rough daily use because the leather strap and dressier presentation are less casual and less forgiving. For legibility, lume, and bracelet-based versatility, the Omega is better suited to everyday wear; for water resistance, the Breitling has the edge. Overall practicality favors the Omega. Winner: Omega
The Omega’s MSRP is $9,100 versus $9,950 for the Breitling. Both are premium Swiss chronographs, but the Omega includes METAS certification, magnetic resistance, a steel bracelet, and the iconic Speedmaster name, which gives it a strong mix of heritage signal and ownership practicality. The Breitling offers a manufacture manual-wind chronograph with COSC certification, 70-hour reserve, display back, and a more distinctive design language, which increases enthusiast appeal for buyers who value mechanical character and a dressier execution. On listed data alone, the Omega feels like the more complete ownership package for the money, while the Breitling is the more niche, personality-led purchase. Winner: Omega
Compared
310.30.42.50.04.001
AB0930D31L1P1