Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional White Dial
310.30.42.50.04.001
- Case
- 42mm
- MSRP
- $9,100
- Movement
- Manual
- Reserve
- 50h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
310.30.42.50.04.001
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Collectors who want the more iconic chronograph and stronger enthusiast pedigree.
Where it wins
Enthusiasts who prefer a lighter wrist feel and a more futuristic integrated-sports design.
Omega’s manually wound Caliber 3861 is the more enthusiast-significant movement here: it is METAS-certified, runs at 3 Hz, offers 50 hours of power reserve, and includes strong anti-magnetic protection rated to 15,000 gauss. That combination gives it a very compelling balance of mechanical interest, modern certification, and long-term robustness, especially for a historically rooted chronograph. Bremont’s automatic BC77AC is technically stronger on paper in a few respects, with COSC certification, a 4 Hz beat rate, and a longer 62-hour power reserve, which should translate to a smoother sweep and less frequent winding. However, the provided data does not list the same level of magnetic resistance or comparable modern certification detail for the Bremont, and its movement context is less clearly established here. Omega is the more complete technical package; Bremont has the edge in convenience. Winner: Omega
The Bremont is slightly smaller in diameter at 41mm versus 42mm, but it is also thicker at 14.4mm and has a longer 48.7mm lug-to-lug compared with Omega’s 47.5mm. The Omega’s 140g weight is noticeably higher than Bremont’s 106g, so the Bremont should feel lighter and less substantial on the wrist, while the Omega will feel more solid and present. In practical terms, the Omega’s shorter lug-to-lug and detailed wearability notes suggest it wears smaller and more balanced than its 42mm size implies, helped by the twisted-lug case and improved bracelet comfort. The Bremont’s integrated case/bracelet architecture should feel sleek, but the lack of listed adjustment detail makes it harder to predict fine-tuning comfort. For a wider range of wrists, the Omega has the cleaner fit story; the Bremont wins only if you want the lightest-feeling presence. Winner: Omega
The Omega offers the stronger legibility story thanks to its white dial, black tachymeter bezel, and high-contrast moonwatch layout, and the wearability notes specifically call out improved readability and a more compact visual impression. It also has Super-LumiNova, anti-reflective treatment on the inside of the sapphire crystal, a 50m water resistance rating, a transparent caseback, and an easy-adjust bracelet clasp with 2.3mm of micro-adjustment, all of which support practical daily use. Bremont counters with a more water-friendly 100m rating, a domed anti-reflective sapphire crystal, a date display, and a very distinctive black galvanic dial with geometric, fully lumed layer construction described in the wearability notes as visually deep and modern. Its 904L steel construction, DLC mid-case, and ceramic bezel add durability cues, and the lighter weight should help comfort. But the absence of listed lume type and bracelet adjustment details makes it less clearly optimized for daily convenience than the Omega. Winner: Omega
On MSRP alone, Bremont is lower at $8,250 versus Omega at $9,100, so it has the price edge. That said, value for an enthusiast is not just cost; it also depends on how much of the watch’s identity is grounded in recognized collector appeal and ownership confidence. The Omega brings much stronger brand and heritage signals in the provided data through the Speedmaster Moonwatch lineage, METAS certification, and the clearly established Moonwatch formula, which meaningfully supports collector interest and long-term enthusiasm. Bremont’s Supernova has a more distinctive contemporary design and higher-spec water resistance, but the data frames it as a bolder design shift rather than an established icon, so its collector gravity is more dependent on taste. For ownership practicality, Omega’s documented bracelet adjustability, lume, and anti-magnetic spec make it the more confidence-inspiring daily companion. Winner: Omega
Compared
310.30.42.50.04.001
SN41-CHR-SS-BK-B