Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional White Dial
310.30.42.50.04.001
- Case
- 42mm
- MSRP
- $9,100
- Movement
- Manual
- Reserve
- 50h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
310.30.42.50.04.001
M79360N-0012
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Collectors who want the stronger heritage signal and the most iconic nameplate in the pair
Where it wins
Buyers who want higher water resistance and a more durable everyday chronograph
Omega uses the manual-wind Caliber 3861 with 50 hours of power reserve, METAS certification, and a listed 15,000 gauss magnetic resistance rating. That gives it a stronger technical headline and a very enthusiast-friendly spec sheet, especially for owners who value hand-wound ritual and high anti-magnetic performance. Tudor’s MT5813 is automatic, COSC-certified, and stretches to 70 hours of power reserve, which is more convenient for rotation and weekend rest periods. The Tudor also brings a very credible modern chronograph architecture, but the Omega’s METAS certification and magnetic resistance make it the more technically notable movement on paper. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional White Dial
The Omega is 42mm wide, 13.2mm thick, with a 47.5mm lug-to-lug and a listed 140g weight. The wearability note says the twisted-lug case and short lug-to-lug help it wear smaller and more balanced than the dimensions suggest, while the 20mm bracelet, strong taper, and compact easy-adjust clasp improve comfort. The Tudor is slightly smaller in diameter at 41mm but notably thicker at 14.4mm, and its lug-to-lug is not listed. The wearability note says it wears more compact than the numbers suggest, but the nearly 50mm span and added thickness still make it more substantial and potentially top-heavy, especially on smaller wrists. On fit, the Omega looks more refined and balanced, while the Tudor is the heavier, more imposing watch. Winner: Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional White Dial
The Omega offers a white dial with black subdials, sapphire crystal with internal AR, Super-LumiNova, and the classic tachymeter-bezel Moonwatch format. Its 50m water resistance is fine for day-to-day life but less confidence-inspiring for more active use. The Tudor’s opaline dial with black counters is also highly legible, and its 200m water resistance is a major practical advantage. It adds screw-down crown hardware and a T-Fit clasp with 8mm of tool-less adjustment, which materially improves everyday comfort and useability. The Omega is better for legibility and pure chronograph charm, while the Tudor is the more durable and versatile daily wearer, especially for sports, travel, and less careful environments. Winner: Tudor Black Bay Chrono
The Tudor has the lower MSRP at USD 6,875 versus USD 9,100 for the Omega, which is a meaningful difference. Omega brings the stronger heritage signal through the Moonwatch name, Speedmaster identity, METAS certification, and 15,000 gauss resistance, all of which support collector appeal and enthusiast cachet. Tudor counters with a robust, COSC-certified movement, 200m water resistance, and a more utility-focused ownership profile at a lower entry price. If value is judged by feature-per-dollar and durability, Tudor has the edge; if it is judged by icon status and collector resonance, Omega is stronger. Winner: Tudor Black Bay Chrono
Compared
310.30.42.50.04.001
M79360N-0012