Tudor Black Bay 41
M79680-0001
- Case
- 41mm
- MSRP
- $4,825
- Movement
- Automatic
- Reserve
- 70h
VS
Building 1v1 comparison
Building 1v1 comparison
1v1 Watch Comparison
A focused side-by-side page for specs, fit, movement details, review notes, and enthusiast context.
M79680-0001
220.12.41.21.03.009
Pair Review
Built from the saved specs and wearability notes for these two watches, then weighed against enthusiast priorities like fit, movement quality, practicality, finishing, value, and collector appeal.
Where it wins
Buyers who want the more affordable luxury-sports package with a steel bracelet and understated presence.
Where it wins
Buyers who want the more technical movement story and stronger sport-oriented credentials.
The Tudor Black Bay 41 uses Tudor’s automatic MT5601, with a 70-hour power reserve and COSC certification, which gives it a strong, credible mechanical foundation for daily use. The Omega Aqua Terra 150M 41mm Blue uses the Omega 8900 automatic caliber, and the provided notes describe it as highly anti-magnetic, beautifully finished, METAS-certified, and featuring a convenient jumping-hour function; however, those details are not all explicitly listed in the core spec fields. Based on the supplied data, Omega has the more technically compelling movement profile, while Tudor counters with a clearly stated 70-hour reserve and COSC certification. Winner: Omega Aqua Terra 150M 41mm Blue
Both watches are 41mm, but the Tudor is thinner at 12.2mm versus the Omega at 13.2mm, which should help it feel a bit more balanced and easier to slip under cuffs. The Omega provides a documented 47.9mm lug-to-lug, which gives a clearer sense of wrist span, and its rubber strap should wear lighter and more casually than steel, while the Tudor’s stainless steel bracelet and T-fit clasp are more substantial and likely more adaptable. The Tudor wearability note says it wears noticeably larger than the excellent Black Bay 39 and may feel substantial on medium wrists, but it also praises the bracelet articulation and T-Fit comfort. The Omega wearability note says the 41mm size and over-13mm thickness make it wear larger than the 38mm Aqua Terra models, though the rubber strap is very comfortable. Winner: Tudor Black Bay 41
The Tudor has an anthracite dial with a flat sapphire crystal, 100m water resistance, a steel bracelet, and a T-fit folding clasp, making it a very practical everyday watch with a more restrained, dress-friendly personality. The Omega adds a blue dial with indexes, Super-LumiNova, 150m water resistance, a sapphire crystal, a rubber strap, and a folding clasp, which makes it the more overtly sporty and visually distinctive option. The Omega’s date display also improves day-to-day utility for many wearers, while the Tudor’s no-date layout offers cleaner symmetry and simpler legibility. For travel and active use, the Omega’s greater water resistance and the movement notes about a jumping-hour function make it the more function-rich piece; for a more classic, understated daily watch experience, the Tudor is easier to wear across settings. Winner: Omega Aqua Terra 150M 41mm Blue
The Tudor carries a much lower MSRP at $4,825 versus $7,100 for the Omega, which is a meaningful difference in favor of the Tudor if you are evaluating the core ownership package on list price alone. The Tudor also has strong heritage signaling through the Black Bay line and a robust modern specification set that makes it feel like a serious enthusiast watch rather than a cosmetic luxury piece. The Omega adds stronger brand-level technical prestige in the supplied notes, but the higher MSRP and sportier execution mean it asks more from the buyer. If value is defined primarily by price-to-feature balance and everyday practicality, the Tudor is the better proposition; if value is defined by movement sophistication and broader technical appeal, the Omega is competitive but still more expensive. Winner: Tudor Black Bay 41
Compared
M79680-0001
220.12.41.21.03.009